Paper Key : IRJ************517
Author: Mr. Akash Urf Hiralal Nandkishor Jaiswal,Dr. V. S. Rajamanya
Date Published: 06 Jul 2024
Abstract
RC columns for high-rise structures are compared in this research. RC floor space for homes is becoming more and more costly. Residential or commercial building utility improvement research and design is welcomed. It was attempted by a large number of designers and researchers. Cantilever beams and floating column structures are widespread. Oblique and Y-shaped columns are employed instead of rectangular or square ones in this study. Twenty-story structures are studied, and the comparison between oblique columns and vertical columns is made. For all analysis and design, ETABS 2016 is the preferred software platform. There is a greater displacement in the regular column compared to the other two. The displacement of a regular column is 26.68 percent more than that of a y-shaped column and 56.78 percent greater than that of an oblique column. The tale drift in a regular column is greater than in the other two. The y-shape column has an 18.91 percent greater tale drift than the oblique column, and a 50.16 percent larger narrative drift than the regular column. The base shear of a normal column is greater than the shear of a hollow column. Y shape column base shear is 47.21 percent greater than the regular column base shear, while oblique column base shear is 54.05. The regular column is longer than the other two. There is a 33.78 percent difference between the regular column and the oblique column when it comes to column time. The frequency of the regular column is greater than that of the other two. The frequency of a regular column is 33.69 percent greater than that of a y-shaped column and 54.64 percent higher than that of an oblique column. The usage of oblique columns and Y-shaped columns in architecture may enhance a structure's aesthetic appeal by providing slanted support components an attractive look.